Friday, November 10, 2017

2. As Above, Not So Below

                = Blog in Progress =
Yes, you can help improve my writing. Though not interested in perfecting this writing to a t, what is desired is a delivery that is as plain and logical as possible. I need your help wherever my words got in the way. Contact me at Penta Publishing for feedback.

----- 

The current theory is that time and space came into existence during the Big Bang right when the process of materialization took place. In this blog, the structural thought for delivering the Big Bang theory this way is investigated together with the maxim As above, so below.

In the 20th century, scientists learned that all matter in our universe is collectively moving outwardly away from one another. Going back in time, like watching a movie spooled backwards, matter seems to have originated from one single event. Turning this event, however, into one that is based on a form of Unity is one step beyond what the information delivers.

No accurate details are available about the first moments, other than what can be established based on the outcome. Note, for instance, that when going back in time, there are no details available establishing the birth of time, and when going back in space, no details are available establishing the birth of space. Rather, the only birthing that can be established based on the discovered information is that of matter.

-----

In light of time and space, scientists follow a path that has Unity at heart, yet an important detail of time and space is then not expressed. Consider the following: people can live in the past or plan for the future, yet these are activities that by definition must occur in the now. In another example, when scanning the universe, the light that left their stars millions of years ago can get captured on earth. Yet the light can only be captured actively in the now. At this very moment, the entire universe exists in the now. It does not exist in any other time frame. 
 

An important aspect of time is therefore separation, because without separation there would be no yesterday or tomorrow. As long as we are alive, we are functioning in this separating time frame we call the now.

A similar perspective can be proposed for space: for each of us there is only the here. And separation is an important aspect of space, too. Without separation there would not be a there next to the here.

Be it space or time, separation lies at the heart of the here and the now. This separating aspect is confirmed when reviewing matter, since collectively all matter is moving outwardly in our universe. When trying to create an overarching reality, such as captured with that word universe, it is easy to smooth over the distinctions of separation, and unite all into one. Yet with separation a full and completely universal aspect is captured, and this leads to a fascinating conclusion.

-----

It defies common sense to have matter originate from a unified reality that subsequently contains, after the Big Bang, separation as its new and universal reality. Either separation existed already prior to the process of materialization or separation is actually the cause of this process. In either case, separation would be the first step for materialization, much like presented with the image of the empty bowl.  

Recognize how separation must have occurred within the state prior to materialization for it to start up that process. There cannot be a pervasive, universal reality of separation, if the potential for separation was not already contained in the original setup. From this the conclusion can be drawn that we exist in some Universe 2.0 version. The option of separation belongs to the previous state. We exist in the result.

Instead of leaving the blanks empty, 20th century scientists filled in the blanks surrounding the material event called the Big Bang and came up with a unified explanation that is neat, clean and artificial. There is no blame to go around because we all follow the desire from time to time to unite information. Yet to understand the big picture, we have to acknowledge that separation is fundamental, and this includes having a fundamentally empty spot.

-----

A promise was made to deliver evidence that the framework of our universe is based on the 0 - 1 option. Perhaps the setup of 0 - 1 was obvious to many already. Calling out the binary system as the basic numerical reality is all it takes to make the point. 

Only ones and zeros are needed to declare anything numerical that any other system, including the decimal system, can also declare. Bringing everything back to the simplest form of using numbers, all we need are two symbols: one number for on and one number for off. Human beings invented other numerical systems but we could have stopped at the binary system, the simplest enumeration for the Structure of Everything.

Because zero is vitally important in the binary system, all other numerical systems need to include zero as well. For instance, the first set of ten numbers for the decimal system can only be 0 to 9 to also deliver what the binary system delivers. The binary system is unique, because there is only one active ingredient. With that in mind, let's look at the dual nature of both the binary and the decimal system, starting with the latter. Here are the two versions of the decimal system:

 1
11
21
31
 2
12
22
32
 3
13
23
33
 4
14
24
34
 5
15
25
35
 6
16
26
36
 7
17
27
37
 8
18
28
38
 9
19
29
39
10
20
30
40


00
10
20
30
01
11
21
31
02
12
22
32
03
13
23
33
04
14
24
34
05
15
25
35
06
16
26
36
07
17
27
37
08
18
28
38
09
19
29
39
 

The sets of ten on the left side appear to correctly deliver the contents. Yet on the right side, with a proper use of zeros, we can see the more logical delivery for the sets of ten. To the right, each set of ten has the same first number in common, be it 0, 1, 2 or 3. To the right, every number in the next set of ten would start with a 4.

Keep in mind that both deliveries are acceptable. Counting fingers, for instance, is more easily done using the set of ten shown to the left. Yet 20 degrees in temperature may in our minds be indeed the first number in its set of ten as shown to the right, most likely because zero degrees also occurs naturally within the system. Depending on its use, there can be a preference of one version over the other. Let's create two versions for the binary system to bring the message home.

1
10
11
100
101
110
111
1000
1001
1010
1011
1100
1101
1110
1111


0
1
10
11
100
101
110
111
1000
1001
1010
1011
1100
1101
1110

Where the decimal system may create confusion due to its many members, the binary system presents us a plain view because there is only one active ingredient. The two versions above showcase how intrinsic the distinction is between starting with one or with zero. 

We can pick either version, yet only for the version starting out with zero are all options considered. The version to the right starts out with a set of 0 and 1. Next, there is a set of 10 and 11. Then there is a set of four numbers: 100, 101, 110 and 111. There are also eight numbers with four digits, though number eight is not shown for the version to the right. It is included in the table below.


0
1
10
11
100
101
110
111


1000
1001
1010
1011
1100
1101
1110
1111
 


In this table, all eight binary numbers with 4 digits are shown to the right. Recognize how this version that includes zero in the first spot to the left allows us to combine the numbers with 1 digit, 2 digits and 3 digits and get the same count of eight numbers. If we had started out with 1, we would not have had an equal count for both sides. Again, to start out with 1 is well allowed, but it should be recognized as artificial because it ignores one of the two basic numbers.

----- 

Before we end this blog on the Structure of Everything, let's investigate the magical saying As above, so below. The following was copied from Wikipedia in 2017:

"That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above corresponds to that which is Below, to accomplish the miracle of the One Thing." Thus, whatever happens on any level of reality (physical, emotional, or mental) also happens on every other level.

It is actually not that difficult to show that this is incorrect.

Take as example the ability to make lists, for instance, grocery lists. Once a week we go for major grocery shopping, and a list is used. On the list, there's everything needed for the week. This is done on a weekly basis for an entire year, and there are therefore 52 lists in total.

Next, to clarify the maxim as incorrect, a list is added containing all these weekly grocery lists. Instead of items, the overall list only contains the names of the grocery lists themselves. This could be accomplished, for instance, with naming each of them by their date. The overall list is therefore both identical and different from the individual lists combined. 

Universally speaking, all 53 of them are lists. Yet they are not unified in their nature. The single overall list points to all weekly lists, while these grocery lists point to the items themselves. Let's add an item to all 53 lists. 

If we add an item to one of the 52 grocery lists, this would not change the overall list. If cheese was added one week, it would make that specific list one item longer, but not the overall list. There is no need to go to the store twice because of adding cheese to the list. Meanwhile, we cannot simply add an actual list to the overall list without making an extra trip to the store. That what is above is therefore not what is below, list-wise. The actions of these lists do not behave identically; by understanding one, we cannot fully and automatically understand the other.

Something similar has been declared about the truth. There is no absolute truth without declaring the framework in which that truth is pronounced. Blue describes something else, for instance, in a paint store than about the mood someone is in. The United Nations are, in another example, not as united as the United States, and neither of them is as united as Manchester United. The framework must be declared for a specific word to have its accurate meaning, be it a sometimes cooperative organization, an entity that taxes folks in more ways than just financially, or a soccer club of red devils.

The Structure of Everything need not explain everything in detail. It needs to be true based on its own framework. Naturally, known details cannot conflict with the overall framework, just like adding cheese to a grocery list did not conflict with the overall list of lists. Important to reiterate is that the Structure of Everything contains large concepts.

----- 

In this blog it was established that the Universe we live in is the result of a previous state - if we accept that separation is a universal condition. Evidence was provided that numerical systems always contain a zero, because the binary system is the blue print for all numerical systems. An overall framework of large concepts does not need to function the same way as a framework of detailed items. As Above, So Below is a saying; it is not inherently true.

In the next blog the search is on for cyclops, and the pyramid is introduced as the visual display for the Structure of Everything.

-----

Delivery based on In Search of a Cyclops, published by Penta Publishing.

Feel this draft can use some improvement? Send feedback at: pentapublishing.com