Tuesday, April 3, 2018

8. Origin

             = Work in Progress =

Yes, you can help improve my writing of this latest blog. Though not interested in perfecting the writing to a t, what is desired is a delivery that is as plain and logical as possible. I need your help wherever my words got in the way. Contact me at Penta Publishing for feedback.


Taking a closer look at the subatomic structures of matter will help with clarifying the Structure of Everything as presented in this blog. The distinction between a unified structure and a unifying structure should become crystal clear. It should also become clear why a philosopher – literally a lover of wisdom – has an easier time capturing the big picture than anyone else.


It may be a stout remark, but a scientist will never be able to tell the entire story from the driver seat perspective; describing the largest scientific picture, she will ride shotgun and observe how the driver behaves and how well the car performs. But a scientist will never declare anything from the driver seat itself.

A philosopher has an easier time in the driver seat, and may declare something as if he were the car himself, even though physically that would not be possible. Please recognize the distinction in character between both seekers of the truth.

Other folks can be on board as well, telling their big-picture stories. In the back seat, we may find a priest and a mystic. Neither is seated up-front. Sitting behind the scientist, he will put his trust in the automobile, or self-moving machine, and prays it will not get into an accident. Meanwhile sitting behind the driver, she will only talk about the trip and how it was all determined by what fuels each of them inside.

Though the following cannot be told by a scientist or a priest, either one could come close to telling the same story as presented.


In a previous blog, materialization was said to have occurred at a specific cross road after conflicting energies had come into existence. Prior to materialization there was only dark energy (A). For some reason, an inward direction started up in this dark energy collective.

During the inward movement, a center got established in which moving inward further was no longer possible. This inner area is called dark matter (B). The outer regions of dark energy (A) kept moving inward as if nothing had happened. Caught right in the middle between both positions, specific dark energy (C) got warped so badly it materialized. The moment for this to occur is proposed in this blog as the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.

But what happened more exactly in ordinary words? Imagine being the dark energy (C) that is stuck between an immobile wall of dark matter (B) and the overall dark-energy 'directive' (A) to unite beyond that wall. We can assume that there was no prior agreement on what to do when the directive turned out to be impossible to complete, and of course a wall was not going to do any of the talking.

For the dark energy (C) caught in the middle there is no other option than to disengage from both impossible scenarios and to go where no energy had gone before.


The scientist may state that the outcome happened because it happened, even accepting that matter (C) appeared deus ex machina, and stating we should be bothered only by what we can know now based on the available information. She would never use the words God, directive, freedom, motivation, desire or a consciousness inherent to the energized state (A) prior to materialization. The scientist will have no exact voice in telling the origin story in ordinary words, though observing the following from a scientific perspective is fine.

The priest may have more to say. At one point in time, priests and scientists were one and the same people. The Vatican Observatory is a reminder that priests also like to look at the stars. And indeed, with the solid dark matter (B) we can declare – if so desired – the existence of a fully unified God, an entity that is then found beside us. Yet matter (C) occurred in this scenario because there was no entry into this exclusive heaven, so there is a divine problem. Confronted with this complication, priests will tell us too quickly to trust that all is in good hands.

Important to note: only the mystic and the philosopher can tell the entire story, because they are not bound by structural conventions. Naturally, their stories will have some coloration. The mystic entices to look at what exists inside all of us, while the philosopher gladly takes place behind the wheel and do the driving, wherever that road leads them.


The Structure of Everything is a dual structure that can be envisioned, for instance, as a pyramid. The beauty of the pyramid is its simplicity: it is the duo-positional combination of the square of one and the square of two. The pyramid shows us three oppositional realities: at the bottom two sets of opposing corners exists, while the top can be seen as the singular position in opposition to the four corners at the bottom.

The Unity that can be envisioned in top is once-removed from the four grounded positions. If we may believe the proposed translation, then the word 'pyramid' means One that comes forth from height. In plain English the word would translate into something like United but only in top.

While duality is the essential feature for the Structure of Everything, there is plenty freedom to come up with dual outcomes other than a pyramid. Let's follow up the duo-positional model using the squares of two and three. This delivers 4 plus 9, showing us the 13 dimensions as found in a Rubik's Cube.

The nine external bottom boxes of a Rubik's Cube align through the center with the nine top boxes. The eight external boxes of the middle layer are aligned themselves through the center, four times in total. Together, one can find 13 alignments. If so desired, one can claim that the center box in the Rubik's Cube (the one that holds the turning mechanism) is the secret place for Unity, the square of one. In this model, it is not visible to the outside world.

Of course, the models on display can continue, for instance, with the duo-positional combination of the squares of three and four, which means there are (9 + 16 =) 25 aligning outcomes, a number that itself is the square of five. Notice how we are moving away from simplicity. But perhaps Pythagoras comes to mind, as well as 3² + 4² = 5² and right-angled triangles? Pythagoras is said to be the first person to have called himself a philosopher.


Positionally placed before the pyramidal model, one more important duo-positional combination exist, before the squares of one and two. With the squares of zero and one, the essential model of duality comes into focus. Visually, it is a simple dot surrounded by space. If so desired, we can declare the center of the dot hollow. 

This 01 pair is the basic Structure of Everything, though the freedom to use a different combination is ensured by the zero position. The place of zero need not be taken in by Unity, yet this is an option. 

We can probably all admit that we have a strong affinity for Unity, be it with money, with language, with religion, with family. The exception is perhaps politics? We have gotten this far in life particularly because of Unity. It should not come as a surprise that the initial move that led to materialization was based on that desire for Unity as well. 


Let's investigate the basic 0 – 1 pair with a number game that exists within the decimal system. When adding up all individual numbers of a single larger number, for instance number 1992, one can find a single final number. The individual numbers in the example add up to 1+9+9+2 = 21. These two numbers subsequently add up to 2+1 = 3. This way, one can state that 1992 is a 3 number.

It is understood that a 0 within a larger number would not add anything. With 2001, for instance, we can quickly see how 2+1 = 3. But 1992 was also a 3 number, and so we can see that a 9 also does not add anything to the outcome in this specific number game. Zero and 9 are behaving to some extent the exact same way.

The more important information to note is how out of all possible outcomes there is only one 0 number; it occurs only once. All other outcomes range from 1 to 9 and are repeated ad infinitum. The numbers with contents are diverse, while the singular number without content is found one time only. If so desired, one can declare 9 the placeholder for zero.


Looking at the origin of matter, the periodic table shows us an organization of atoms with a first shell (or period) containing a maximum of two positions, one for hydrogen, one for helium. Few of us may realize this in our daily lives, but hydrogen and helium are the most abundant elements in the universe. Only 2 percent of all matter is thought to be comprised of other elements. 

Let's describe several aspects of the atomic and subatomic reality, while looking for opportunities to declare something about the overall structure of everything. Keep in mind that I am not going for perfectly describing all that exists at all these levels, but for making the overall structural organization understandable from a philosophical perspective.

The subatomic players that can get distinguished are the proton, the electron and the neutron. One can claim that helium materialized first because, with two neutrons and two protons, it resembles the four grounded features of the pyramid. The single 'top' position in the helium structure (better: the extreme positions in the structure) would contain in total two electrons, which is a conflict with the single top position of the pyramid. These minuscule particles with a mass 1/1836 of a proton would undermine the idea of Unity in top. 

Ask anyone about fractures that exist in our established united ways and all can come up with examples. No church exists that unites all people. No money exists that all use exclusively. No family exists that has not experienced friction. The top appears united, and it is mostly united. But under a microscope one will always find fractures. A pyramid is an abstract model only; Unity is an artificial reality. So, let's accept that both electrons try to point to Unity, trying to be of help in establishing a unifying environment.


The hydrogen atom is the only element that does not have a neutron; this atom is sometimes called protium as well. Hydrogen is the most abundant chemical substance in the universe, and close to all of it (99.98 percent) is protium. Contrast this with helium that has two neutrons. To describe hydrogen fully: a relatively small number of hydrogen comes with one neutron (deuterium, stable, found in heavy water) or with two neutrons (tritium, which decays).

What can be distilled from this information is that the neutron has some interesting properties in our material reality. All elements besides hydrogen come with cooperating neutrons; yet hydrogen can exist in a charged balance without a neutron, containing just the positive proton and the negative electron.


The elements in the periodic table are numbered according to the number of electrons and the number of protons in the nucleus. Carbon, for instance, has 6 protons and 6 electrons and takes in position number 6. It gets a tiny bit sloppier with the neutrons, because three different outcomes are known to occur for carbon with 6, 7, or 8 neutrons.

Since this also involves our physical selves: most scientists declare that organic matter must have both carbon and hydrogen components. One element contains neutrons, the other most-abundant accompanying element does not.


Reviewing matter, one can state that with the Big Bang a new self-based reality was created (C). Matter is therefore different from the two other options, resembling neither the impenetrable dark matter (B) on the one hand or the stark general directive of dark energy (A) on the other. Yet within this new material reality (C) both experiences were incorporated nevertheless: a natural limit occurs with anything material, and matter is driven by an internal drive to unite.

Though the universe is enormous, one must accept that the material outcome of the conflicting forces occurred first and foremost at the subatomic level. The packages that came into material being are protons, neutrons, electrons.  

Amazingly, the tremendous pressures occurring at pinprick spots immediately prior to materialization are captured in the outcome; there is no single basic unit that is the one unit representing materialization. Said differently: it was a messy event of many subatomic units becoming different, supporting aspects of matter (almost) simultaneously. We find a chorus of discontent.


With all these parts of the warped dark energy creating a self-based and new reality (C), we now live in a material universe. How did this happen? Let's present this in the abstract, acknowledging that there are imperfections in the outcome, but letting the imperfections be for now.

Imagine a thick layer of dark energy (still within A) that is under enormous pressures, and how this layer, on its way to materialization, is starting to crack – in this presentation considered to lead to an enormously large amount of cubicles surrounded by cracks.

What we end up reviewing is a single cube of dark energy, to examine the details. The cube of dark energy is under enormous pressures, and cracking on all 6 sides. Where at first this energy existed as dark energy only (A), it is exposed now to a reality it had no prior knowledge of. As a reaction, the center of the cube solidifies (C), its energy uniting. Yet only the center united.

One can state that a miniature recreation (C) was established of the large ball of dark matter (B) that the energized cube had encountered just moments before as a solid wall. It is as if the directive to unite (A) was still followed, but since that was not possible, a recreation of that Unity (B) was pursued.

A priest would be able to state that this can be seen as the material recreation in miniature form (C) of God (B). A perfectly round ball at the center of the minuscule cube of warped dark energy (C), mimicking what it could not become. Because the energy succeeds in achieving the desired outcome, let's call this ball the neutron (with C).


Multiply this state with many, many neutrons occurring in the thick layer of dark energy under pressure, and then notice how much space is left between the neutrons. This  remnant of dark energy, too, had nowhere else to go. One option for organization seems most likely to have occurred.

The neutrons are created side by side per layer. Viewed from one perspective, the neutrons are organized in enormous rows like eggs in a carton. Yet on top of these layers, the next layer is stacked more tightly. Envision this fit, for instance, how a fifth egg would be stacked above four supporting eggs in an open carton. Please recognize the pyramidal structure that can be envisioned between each neutron plus its four neutrons found either one layer above or below.

In between the neutrons, a distinctly different particle starts to occur, one that can be called the proton. The proton (with C) is made from the remaining dark energy, the residue that exists between the neutrons. The proton is aware of its imperfection, because at heart there is no accomplished unity. No surprise therefore that the proton has a charge.

Let's play one more chicken and egg statement with the claim that the protons materialized first in large numbers after which many neutrons had no choice but to also exist within the material realm. Innocent at heart, the neutron caused the proton to materialize. Not all too happy, and charged up, the proton returned the favor.


The forest is thick with trees. But if you come away with understanding how a priest could declare the following divine structure, the goal of seeing things in a new and different light is met. If the dark matter at the center of the Big Bang (B) is declared God, and if all neutrons (with C) recreated this perfect state in miniature format, then we can envision a divine resemblance at the heart of most elements with each neutron. That is, all elements except for hydrogen, the most abundant element in our Universe 2.0 that has no neutrons.

In reality, the abstract delivery is not perfectly followed. Realize that the thick layer of warped dark energy materialized in an almost flat environment. Almost. Just like the earth's circumference appears flat at close inspection from our grounded level, viewed from space we see its curvature quite clearly. Materializing energy occurred in an almost flat setting during the Big Bang, so the curvature would have to bend some of the outcomes away from that 'perfectly' flat-structured shape.

One could say indeed that with the creation of matter (C) a 'Big Bang' played out. Yet equally possible is that materialization occurred in a less combustible fashion. It wouldn't be pleasant for all matter involved, but calling it a 'bang' is only proposed in the prevailing scientific story. The structure presented in this blog, using the exact same scientific information, has materialization occurring in a different spot and fashion. An alternative, more fitting name would be: the Big Crackle, the Big Roast, or the Big Whisper.

Seven periods (or shells) are currently known in chemistry, and the maximum number of elements per subsequent shell is as follows: 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32. One can notice how the same number repeats once in a following period, except for the first shell of 2 elements (containing 98% of all matter).

Presenting the numbers 2, 8, 18 and 32 in a different way, one can write them down as the square of one doubled, the square of two doubled, the square of three doubled, and the square of four doubled. It is almost as if a child was playing with elementary building blocks. Correction: make that two children.

Important to note is that a Fibonacci sequence did not occur. Fibonacci numbers are of interest, because the sequence occurs often in biological settings. That specific sequence makes use of a dual reality in which a zero (or an immature position) is an essential aspect. The famous rabbit calculation explains why the otherwise natural doubling effect is postponed in the Fibonacci sequence by one period.


The basics for the periodic table do not follow the Fibonacci sequence, and appears therefore surprisingly simpler. Still, an explanation must be found why the first period with a maximum of two elements occurs only once. Because, from the first period on, repetition seems the norm.

An explanation can be proffered with pointing to zero and how this is the singular number that represents the freedom to come to many different outcomes. Zero in a first position occurs just once; is indistinguishable from any other zero. Yet as soon as a specific expression is established in a spot, the freedom to establish anything else in that initial spot is used up. Interestingly, in the first period we do find a doubled one-times-one outcome; two positions are found, once, and not repeated.

Any and all following periods appear to not be unique and – because our universe is based on a dual framework – an additional display of the same number would then automatically follow. Only with the first period, at the atomic heart, we find a character that is in essence unique; and this remains unique even when its is multiplied into every piece of matter in our universe.


The first shell or period with just two possible elements, hydrogen and helium, provides us a clear handle about the origin of matter. Hydrogen shows us on the one hand the unique expressing of the single kind: one proton only with an accompanying electron, and no neutron. The outcome has a neutral charge. The other option of the first period, helium, shows us that this matter contains a more established dual nature - loud and clear. 

Recognize how we have two different atomic structures of the first period declaring their own version of unifying matter. As mentioned, both make up 98% of matter.

The second shell or period has a maximum of eight proton and eight electron positions, and let's postulate that the center bond is the essential bond. There is a limit of eight additional positions, and perhaps the importance of that number has become obvious by now, because we find 2 + 8 elements after completing the second period.

Recognize that the hydrogen atom is not at play here. Each of the two neutrons (2) in the helium nucleus represent a completed unification (each by itself) surrounded by four electrons (8) in the completed second period/shell. Together we should be able to see a pyramid doubled. At heart we find one unified neutron doubled, and four guardians surrounding it doubled.

It is therefore the center bond between the two neutrons, forced into matter by two protons, that carries everything through. Though there is no demand that two protons and two protons only can carry the essential material bond, the question can get posed sincerely whether this dual setup explains our being here in material form best.


One should recognize the importance of doubling, even be applicable to our daily lives, because doubling helps in establishing the permanence of an outcome. Money as an institution, for instance, is not immediately put firmly in place; it takes time getting used to it, and one can suggest that in a way this is a form of doubling.  

Review the establishment of currencies, for instance, in the United States, and one can notice an era in which trial and error for coinage and bank notes took place. Particularly when a larger entity, in this case the Federal Reserve, guarantees a national currency, then folks are enticed to use that money. Quickly, but only after it is firmly established, confirmed, all can see the tremendous benefits of the currency.

Or review the establishment of political parties. Particularly during the early stages of a new system, time is involved before parts (and parties) are established solidly. It takes time, confirmation, trial and error, before the various parts are solidly in place. In some kind of way, folks are waiting to see if a setup holds, before they start accepting it is as an established norm.

There are options to create different ways to solidify a system. With winner-takes-all (for instance, UK, US), the two major parties are solidly in control, and revolutions notwithstanding these two parties will be in control forever and ever. In proportional democracies it is easier to establish a new political party and send an old one to the graveyard. In the more modern version of democracy, the collective of parties is solidly established to represent a nation's power, but this is not a given for any individual party. Voters are the established power, and no two parties can fix the game and hog the seats all to themselves.


Where does the electron has its place? Because the proton is positively charged, it creates a charged field. The negatively charged electron portrays the negativity that must occur in the surroundings of the proton. One can imagine the internal forces of unifying energy at work in the proton, while it does not arrive at a single center of bliss. At heart, the proton is restless. In the field surrounding the proton, we find with the electron as the opposing charge the counter expression of this restless state. There is no essence to the electron, other than what is supported (and measurable) by the local-environmental collective.


A surprise awaits us if we declare that the desire for Unity was the driving force behind the inward movement of dark energy (A) before the Big Bang occurred. If there was indeed a motivation within a conscious collective, then this points to a unmet outcome within this state (A). Perhaps this existed as something that can be considered lost and that had to be found, or something that was seen as ideal and needed to be chased. This would indicate that the previous state of our universe was not the first state.

It gets complicated quickly, because the sketch of our previous state of the universe is already based on a distillation of our current situation. To move an additional step within this distillation, the chance of sincere warping is tremendous. Yet as option, we have found a plausible story line to reason that we do not live in Universe 2.0, but in Universe 3.0. The previous state was not based on a neutral condition.

The downside of this profound projection is that there is no additional layer available for discussion, except for outlandish speculation. We cannot know whether the state prior to our prior state was based on unification, as in ever, or whether boredom was so great that an ideal was promoted that ended up being a painful fallacy.


So, it was zero all along that caused materialization? The dark energy, caught in the middle between the solid dark matter (B) and the directive originally supported by all dark energy (A), used zero to its own benefit? The particular energy we are most concerned with (C) paid zero attention to the directive (A) and it paid zero attention to dark matter (B). It internalized both energetic positions as if they were its own, using the empowering position of ignorance as its magic wand.

The resulting matter (C) has unification at heart plus a direction to move through time and space. The big picture is not based on unification, yet the parts found within the big picture are based on a natural, unifying directive.

As said, the scientist will dislike this specific story because it cannot be replicated in a laboratory, even though she can recognize many aspects. The priest may be able to do more with it; not only can God be claimed at the spot of the solid dark matter (B), but the neutron within matter can be seen as the internalized divine handbook within each of us to find our way home. 

Yet ultimately the mystic and the philosopher may be on the right track, because their destination is not based on where we are coming from, but where we are going.


Are you ready for the final blog about the destination of the trip? 

Blog Chips


Narrative based on In Search of a Cyclops, published by Penta Publishing.

Feel this draft can use improvement? Send feedback at: pentapublishing.com


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home